The Battle For eCigs Has Been Officially WON! The Facts On Your Screen..

I have spent hours and pulled an all-nigther to figure it out.


Will electronic cigarettes be banned in Malaysia, or heavily regulated?


We must first understand the people who will make those decisions.

Lets take for example on what we can see in the States..

New Jersey Former Governor Jon Corzine

Approved and signed into law a ban on using electronic cigarettes in public places. Jon Corzine believes that they are dangerous, you cannot use eCigs in bars, restaurants, etc. SIGNED INTO LAW, APPROVED.

Governor Jon Corzine - DEMOCRAT.


Oregon Attorney General John Kroger

Submitted an injunction to prohibit Smoking Everywhere from selling eCigs in the State of Oregon.

"This settlement will help protect our teens from unsafe products"

John Kroger – DEMOCRAT.


New York Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo

Aided in the proposal of the New York eCig ban.

Andrew M. Cuomo - DEMOCRAT.


New York State Assemblyman Jeffrey Klein

He proposed and promoted legislation (S7234) that would ban the sale of e-cigarettes in the state of New York.

Democratic State Committeeman and District Leader (1994). Current NY Assemblyman (D-34th District)

Jeffrey Klein - DEMOCRAT.


California Attorney General Edmund J Brown Jr

“Electronic cigarette companies have targeted minors with fruit-flavored products and misleading claims that their products are safe,”

Filed the lawsuit against SE. Charmian of the Democratic Party (1989–1991)

Edmund J Brown Jr - DEMOCRAT.




----- THE OTHER SIDE OF THE AISLE -----




Judge Richard J. Leon Federal District Court Judge

First political footprint, made on January 14, ruled against the FDA. HIS TAGLINE? ...

" ORDERED that FDA shall not detain or refuse admission into the United States of Smoking Everywhere's electronic cigarette products ...SO ORDERED" (Civil Case No. 09-771)

Judge Richard J. Leon - REPUBLICAN



Mat Salmon, Former US Congressman, President of the Electronic Cigarette Association

He says to the FDA, I quote:

“THE MESSAGE IS WRONG, AND IT CANNOT BE A GOOD THING”

Mat Salmon – REPUBLICAN.


Florida Representative Cliff Stearns

From CNN News Article:

“President Obama, who has described himself as an occasional smoker, has been offered one of the devices by Florida Rep. Cliff Stearns. The Republican lawmaker’s office said the president did not respond.”

Offering Obama Electronic Cigarettes?

REPUBLICAN.


California Governor Arnold Swarchenegger

DENIED AND RESCINDED A PROPOSAL TO BAN ELECTRONIC CIGARETTES. THANK YOU GOVERNOR. Swarchenegger said "adults are old enough to make their own decisions." he believes the FDA doesn't have to make them for us.

Arnold Swarchenegger – REPUBLICAN.


CAN WE SEE A CORRELATION? OR AM I GOING BLIND?


POLITICS 101 CRASH COURSE:

REPUBLICANS WANT: SMALL GOVERNMENT, LOWER TAXES, FREE ENTERPRISE

DEMOCRATS WANT: BIG GOVERNMENT, HIGHER TAXES, MORE REGULATION


We clearly see that Republicans are in favor of electronic cigarettes. Can we not?

So,

The mantra and maxim of the court system is this:

“The higher up in court you go, the more political the ruling as opposed to lawful”

WE WANT REPUBLICANS!



“It is ORDERED, on the court's own motion, that this case be scheduled for oral argument on September 23, 2010, at 9:30 A.M., before Circuit Judges Garland and Kavanaugh and Senior Circuit Judge Williams.”

Judge Garland – DEMOCRAT

Judge Kavanaugh – REBUPLICAN

Judge Williams – REPUBLICAN

YEA FOR ECIGS: 2

NAY FOR ECIGS: 1


OUTNUMBERED.


BUT WAIT!

The CHIEF JUDGE, DAVID B. SENTELLE is a hardcore extremist Republican! (He is the Chief Judge in the Circuit, HE HAS THE FINAL WORD)

Quote from his book:

“Judge Dave is sincere and admits up front that this was one case where the results, and not the letter of the law, drove his decision.”

“The result is an endearing account of how a conservative judge faced 15,000 decadent hippies (and at least one elephant), the ACLU, snarky law clerks, a ticking clock, and his own Senate confirmation to the D.C. Circuit in the background, and still managed to avoid catastrophe by avoiding a ruling on the law.”


THE JUDGE (IN HIS OWN BIO) I Saying: LEGAL JARGON AND LINGO, TERMINOLOGY, JURISDICTION DOESN'T MATTER!

What matters is who are the people that will make these decisions? Who are they? And what are their views on eCigs?

The facts on your screen.

Republican leadership dominates the courts, the case for eCigs is looking good.

AGAIN, forget "legality" or "health concerns"

Two views - (1) AGAINST eCigs, (2) FOR eCigs

Who is against, who is for?

If the Judge that takes on this case is Republican - Grab a beer, some McDonals, put a BIG SMILE ON as we watch the court session derail and debunk the FDA. We can all exhale the breath of relief.

If the Judge is a Democrat - your next breath will be filled with regular cigarette smoke.

That's the bottom line.

The Leading Reasons People Use E-Cigarettes Include:

1. Not banned under the smoking ban

2. NO more Expensive Cigarettes

3. NO Flame / Fire - ZERO chance of burning the sofa

4. NO Toxic Carcinogens Causing Lung Cancer

5. NO More Second Hand Smoke - great around the kids

6. NO Ashtrays/Lighters

7. NO Stinking Smoke Breath

8. NO More Yellowing Teeth

9. NO More Going outside to Smoke

10. Breath better. Feel Better. Look Better

11. Great for the Environment

12. Smoke in Bars, Clubs, Movies, Restaurants, etc..

Effects of Smoking

Electronic cigarette – The better solution

Electric cigarette is also referred to as e-cigarette. This cigarette is attracting millions of smokers all over the world. This cigarette is very safe because it has no smoke. It seems as if very soon, traditional smokers will no longer be available in your local store. Demand for them will have waned to levels that will make further production nonviable.

Electric cigarettes share several aspects with traditional counterparts although they are very safe. They have the same appearance, the feel the same and taste the same. This cigarette does not release any tar. It does not release any heat and has none of the 4000 harmful chemicals that are responsible for bringing about cardiac and respiratory complications. The carcinogens that people associate with traditional cigarettes are also not present in this electric cigarette. Electronic cigarette has nicotine cartridge having liquid nicotine and when the user inhales, small battery-powered atomizer turns the small amount of the liquid nicotine in vapor. And, inhaling nicotine vapor will give user the nicotine hit within seconds instead of minutes with the patches and the gum. The users inhale the nicotine vapor that looks very much like the smoke without carcinogens in tobacco smoke that are harmful to smoker & others around them.

The electric cigarette is one of the mechanisms that the manufacturers have been exploring in order to show they care about the welfare of their consumers. This cigarette is far better compared to any other traditional cigarette that traditional cigarette manufacturers claim is not hazardous to your health.

The electric cigarette simply simulates the heating and dragging-off mechanism associated with the manner in which traditional cigarettes are smoked. This might tempt you to believe that this cigarette has the same negative effects to your health as the ones that are found in traditional cigarettes.

With electric cigarette, you will never encounter harmful chemicals such as nitrogen dioxide, nitrogen monoxide, acrolein, hydrocyanic acid, hydragyrum and lead. The public has come to like the cigarettes that were at first perceived with much trepidation. Even the Medical Association was a bit skeptical about them at first.

Companies that manufacture E-cigarettes are located in China, US and some countries in Europe. Today, many people are finding it necessary to try out this smokeless cigarette in order to notice the difference. Therefore, you need not worry about a thing.

Tak Nak ROKOK! Say YES to electronic cigarette!!

Governments who ban e-cigarettes are worried about the loss of tax revenue from tobacco. Those governments who have reacted in this way are normally found to derive a greater than normal percentage of their revenues from tobacco - for example, Poland is one such country, where it is said that more than half of adults smoke. Loss of tobacco tax revenue would be a severe blow - imagine what would happen if 50% of smokers switched to an untaxed alternative.


There is no medical research anywhere that e-cigarettes are harmful or might possibly be harmful. This in addition to the fact they they have been used worldwide by millions of people for several years, and no adverse health implications have ever been reported by doctors.


It is impossible for e-cigarettes to be absolutely safe, but a global trial on that scale with no adverse results reported is almost certainly better than could be achieved by the 'safest' pharmaceuticals. Essentially, ecigarettes are a consumer product with no significant health implications. That is bad news for cash-starved governments.


The last person to welcome a safer way of smoking would be the head of a government tax department.

烟盒子包装异常恶心！

我才知道新加坡的烟盒子包装异常恶心！

下面这张照片不算是最恶心的，你感觉如何？

看到这样的盒子，

10个抽烟的，

又有几个可以成功的戒去了烟？